What Does A Stocker Dyno At?
#1
Posted 15 August 2007 - 09:41 PM
w/200 shot-540/650
new turbo numbers soon...
Daily Driver
07TBSS(wife's): 22s, cammed, kooks lt and o/r y, flows, efans, 160 thermo, cai, pullies, Circle D 3200 stall, tranny cooler and deep pan.
405/405
#2
Posted 15 August 2007 - 10:04 PM
I had the truck dynoed before they started installing the goodies and it only made 295. This seemed pretty low but wasn't sure what they dyno stock. Mine is a 2wd with around 800 miles on it. The shop uses a dynojet. I'll haved modded numbers friday.
Guys his truck also has 22 inch wheels...So actually it probably makes 305 or so to the tire
#3
Posted 16 August 2007 - 07:11 AM

^^ Sold ^^
#4
Posted 16 August 2007 - 10:43 AM
Edited by bwl101, 16 August 2007 - 10:44 AM.
Black Powder Coated Wheels
DJM Lowering Kit, F/R Addco Sway Bars
SLP Dual Exit Exhaust w/ cutout
IEATSRT8 CAI and HSRK, Granatelli wires
LS1 Cooling Fans w/ PCMForLess Kit
Lingenfelter 160 Degree Thermostat
PCMForLess Transmission Cooler
HP Tuners
More to come...
Best of: 13.309 @ 103.10mph 1/4 Mi.
#5
Posted 08 September 2007 - 12:45 PM
Mine dynoed at 300 RWHP and 296 RWTQ as a baseline... so damn hot though, it was in July. At least 95 in the shop!
We dyno'd one of our guys Trailblazer SS's, totally stock 2WD
Here's the graph.
#6
Posted 11 September 2007 - 05:00 PM
We dyno'd one of our guys Trailblazer SS's, totally stock 2WD
Here's the graph.
mines pretty close, after about 2 hrs of driving around my truck stock made 265/291 after tune 321.57/329.42
#7
Posted 11 September 2007 - 09:21 PM
#8
Posted 25 September 2007 - 09:22 PM
#9
Posted 25 September 2007 - 11:46 PM
Having the fan kick in sooner by AC pressure makes a big difference in AC performance. If you can stand the fan running a lot...
New paper air filter and 275/45ZR20 Goodyear F1's are the only diffrence from stock.
Why did you stop the graph at ~6100? The engine is worth 6500 RPM and only drops to a little over 297 HP 240 TQ up there.
#10
Posted 14 November 2007 - 12:07 PM
my stock LS1 put down 300/312, did chevy de-tune the TBSS like they did with fbodies so they wouldn't be as fast as the vette?
its disappointing to see the 6.0 putting down numbers the 5.7 makes...what's the deal?
Edited by ssvegas, 14 November 2007 - 12:09 PM.
#11
Posted 15 November 2007 - 01:01 PM
There is more drivetrain loss in the TBSS platform than most LS1 setups due to heavier 20 wheels, etc.these numbers are lower then what i thought the LS2 would put down.
my stock LS1 put down 300/312, did chevy de-tune the TBSS like they did with fbodies so they wouldn't be as fast as the vette?
its disappointing to see the 6.0 putting down numbers the 5.7 makes...what's the deal?
#12
Posted 15 November 2007 - 01:19 PM
We're talkin' apples to oranges guys.... Different Dyno's give different numbers on different days, with different DA / conditions, at different A/F ratios, and even on different dyno runs (one after another)....my stock LS1 put down 300/312....
If you start hand picking (lucky or singular dyno runs), against other (unlucky or bad dyno runs), you get into these debates....
My Dyno numbers came back ok... but right before me a more heavily modified TBSS failed to even achieve my Dyno results, so "state of tune" or lack there of, has alot to do with it....
87 Buick T-Type - 12.10 @ 111.5 (in the Garage)
86 Grand National - 13.29 @ 101.5 (Stolen)
#13
Posted 15 November 2007 - 01:52 PM
There is more drivetrain loss in the TBSS platform than most LS1 setups due to heavier 20 wheels, etc.
yea that sucks.
We're talkin' apples to oranges guys.... Different Dyno's give different numbers on different days, with different DA / conditions, at different A/F ratios, and even on different dyno runs (one after another)....
If you start hand picking (lucky or singular dyno runs), against other (unlucky or bad dyno runs), you get into these debates....
My Dyno numbers came back ok... but right before me a more heavily modified TBSS failed to even achieve my Dyno results, so "state of tune" or lack there of, has alot to do with it....
very true, but it just seems with fbodies there wasn't so much fluctuation.
i just expected the TB to average 340ish.
#14
Posted 15 November 2007 - 08:34 PM
340 for a stocker???? (unless it's a crate engine) No way...i just expected the TB to average 340ish.
RWD 395 X 80% = 316 Theoretical (Most are around 300)
AWD 395 X 78% = 308 (Most are around 293)
Most tunes add some HP (20-25), but loads of Torque.... Like 35 to 40 RWD / AWD...
87 Buick T-Type - 12.10 @ 111.5 (in the Garage)
86 Grand National - 13.29 @ 101.5 (Stolen)
#15
Posted 03 December 2007 - 10:41 PM
Dynomite Dyno
327 RWHP @ 313 TQ The torque looks weird because I had problems with the Stablitrack staying off.
I will post the sheet tomorrow.
BTW it was 76 degrees inside the shop and the Humidity was down to 3.5% only.
Edited by Speedmaster747, 03 December 2007 - 10:52 PM.

14.44 @ 96.6 mph----->
TBSS Shaky fog light fix----->
TBSS HID's-----> http://youtube.com/watch?v=2cf6538UtY0
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










